-----Original Message-----
From: Barry [mailto:ba@fieldworks.net]
Sent:
Friday, June 23, 2006 10:07 AM
To: Braden, Ronald
Subject: RE: Public Records Request re City Council Attendance at Certain Closed Sessions
Sensitivity: Confidential

 

So when the investigation as to the leaks occurs there will be no listing of whom attended each closed session.

 

Barry Allen

818 243 1502

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Braden, Ronald [mailto:RBraden@ci.glendale.ca.us]
Sent:
Thursday, June 22, 2006 4:57 PM
To: ba@fieldworks.net
Subject: RE: Public Records Request re City Council Attendance at Certain Closed Sessions
Sensitivity: Confidential

 

 

 

Attendance records are not kept.  The closest that one can come to determine which Council members attended closed session is to review the minutes.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry [mailto:ba@fieldworks.net]
Sent:
Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:07 PM
To: Braden, Ronald
Subject: RE: Public Records Request re City Council Attendance at Certain Closed Sessions
Sensitivity: Confidential

 

The minutes generally show who attended regular meetings, not who attended closed sessions

 

Barry Allen

818 243 1502

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Braden, Ronald [mailto:RBraden@ci.glendale.ca.us]
Sent:
Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:57 PM
To: ba@fieldworks.net
Cc: Kassakhian, Ardashes; Buchanan, Rita
Subject: Public Records Request re City Council Attendance at Certain Closed Sessions
Sensitivity: Confidential

 

We are in receipt of your request for public records date June 13, 2006, related to providing “attendance for City Council  (Redevelopment Agency and Housing Authority) closed sessions involving 1) Flint Cyn Acquisition; 2) Armenian Society of Los Angeles negotiations;  4) GFFA and related GMA negotiations for contract beginning 7-1-2006; 4) Flower Street ‘Punch Through’; 5) Right of way acquisition for Flower Street I5 ramp.”  Please be advised that there are no records responsive to your request.  However, the minutes of the City Council may provide some indication of the information you are seeking.  These minutes are available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk, located at 613 East Broadway, Suite 110, Glendale, California.  You may purchase copies of these records at $.10 cents per page.

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry [mailto:ba@fieldworks.net]
Sent:
Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:19 PM
To: Kassakhian, Ardashes; Varpetian, Lucy; Buchanan, Rita
Subject: CPRA Closed Session Attendance

 

 

VANGUARD

1315 Ruberta Ave., Glendale, CA 91201

818 243 1502 – vanguard1@charter.net

Contributions are tax deductible – Rev. Proc. 92-85, 1992-42 I.R.B. 32

VIGILANCE leads to ACCOUNTABILITY

 

June 13, 2006

Ardy Kassakhian, City Clerk

City of Glendale, CA

613 E. Broadway

Glendale, CA 91206

 

  Email 


RE: Public Records Act Request Reference: Closed Session Attendance

Dear Mr. Kassakhian:

 

Pursuant to my rights under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 et seq.) and the California Constitution, as amended by passage of Prop 59 on November 3, 2004, I am writing to request inspection of the following records, which I understand to be in the possession of your agency:

 

Provide attendance for City Council  (Redevelopment Agency and Housing Authority) closed sessions involving 1) Flint Cyn Acquisition; 2) Armenian Society of Los Angeles negotiations;  4) GFFA and related GMA negotiations for contract beginning 7-1-2006; 4) Flower Street ‘Punch Through’; 5) Right of way acquisition for Flower Street I5 ramp.

 

I ask for a determination on this request within 10 days of your receipt of it, and an even earlier reply if you can make that determination without having to review the record(s) in question.

 

If you determine that any or all or the information is exempt from disclosure, I ask that you reconsider that determination in view of Prop 59, which has amended the state Constitution to require that all exemptions be "narrowly construed." Prop 59 may modify or overturn authorities on which you have relied in the past.

 

If you nonetheless determine that the requested records are subject to a still-valid exemption, I would further request that: (1) you exercise your discretion to disclose some or all of the records notwithstanding the exemption; and (2) that, with respect to records containing both exempt and non-exempt content, you redact the exempt content and disclose the rest.

 

You must provide assistance by helping to identify records and information relevant to the request and suggesting ways to overcome any practical basis for denying access.

 

Finally, should you deny part or this entire request, you are required to provide a written response describing the legal authority or authorities on which you rely. Please also address the question whether Prop 59 requires disclosure even though authorities predating Prop 59 may appear to support your exemption claim.

 

Records concerning litigation are exempt only until the claim is resolved or settled. Upon disposition all records including court records and those pre-dating the suit are public.

 

If I can provide any clarification that will help expedite your attention to this request, please contact me at the number above.  I ask that you notify me of any duplication costs so that I may decide which records I want copied.

 

I am sending a copy of this letter to your legal advisor to help encourage a speedy determination, and I would likewise be happy to discuss my request with him or his designee at any time.

 

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

 

Sincerely,

Barry Allen