-----Original Message-----
From: Varpetian, Lucy [mailto:LVarpetian@ci.glendale.ca.us]
Sent:
Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:24 PM
To: Vanguard
Cc: Howard, Scott; Buchanan, Rita; Kassakhian, Ardashes
Subject: RE: CPRAR 22607W2

 

Mr. Allen:

 

I reviewed your request again, and it appears that the first page of the responsive documents were not presented to you.  We will make the records available again for your review.  We have no objection to producing these records, and have made them available to you in previous years as well. 

 

Lucy Varpetian

Senior Assistant City Attorney

Office of the Glendale City Attorney

613 East Broadway, Suite 220

Glendale, CA  91206

Tel: 818-548-2080

Fax: 818-547-3402

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanguard [mailto:vanguard1@charter.net]
Sent:
Tuesday, March 06, 2007 4:33 PM
To: Varpetian, Lucy
Subject: RE: CPRAR 22607W2

 

Your reply was unresponsive. The only W3 was for Workforce Investment Act.

 

Barry Allen

818 243 1502

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Varpetian, Lucy [mailto:LVarpetian@ci.glendale.ca.us]
Sent:
Monday, March 05, 2007 2:11 PM
To: vanguard1@charterinternet.com
Cc: Kassakhian, Ardashes; Buchanan, Rita
Subject: RE: CPRAR 22607W2

 

Mr. Allen:

 

As we informed you in January 2006, in response to a similar request relating to 2005 W-2 forms for all city employees, the information you seek with regard to the W-2 form for all city employees is privileged and therefore exempt from production pursuant to Government Code Section 6254(k), “records, the disclosure of which is exempted or prohibited pursuant to federal or state law...”  The specific law which prohibits disclosure of tax related information is California Revenue and Taxation Code section 7056.  Brown v. Superior Court (71 Cal. App. 3d 141, 143 (1977)) extends the privilege to W-2 forms, because they are required to be attached to a taxpayer’s state and federal income tax return and constitute an integral part of the return.

 

Records relating to the W-3 are available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk.

 

Lucy Varpetian

Senior Assistant City Attorney

Office of the Glendale City Attorney

613 East Broadway, Suite 220

Glendale, CA  91206

Tel: 818-548-2080

Fax: 818-547-3402

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanguard [mailto:vanguard1@charterinternet.com]
Sent:
Saturday, February 24, 2007 8:09 PM
To: Kassakhian, Ardashes; Varpetian, Lucy; Buchanan, Rita
Subject: CPRAR 22607W2

 

 

VANGUARD

POB 11202, Glendale, CA 91226

818 243 1502 – vanguard1@charter.net

Contributions are tax deductible – Rev. Proc. 92-85, 1992-42 I.R.B. 32

VIGILANCE leads to ACCOUNTABILITY

 

February 26, 2007

Ardy Kassakhian, City Clerk

City of Glendale, CA

613 E. Broadway

Glendale, CA 91206

 

Email


RE: Public Records Act Request Reference: 22707w2

Dear Mr. Kassakhian:

 

Pursuant to my rights under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 et seq.) and the California Constitution, as amended by passage of Prop 59 on November 3, 2004, I am writing to request inspection of the following records, which I understand to be in the possession of your agency:

 

Please provide W-2s for all employees of the City, Agencies, Authorities for year ending 2006 where gross pay is in excess of $100,000. You may redact names and address but not City and Zip code. Also provide W-3s for all payrolls.

 

I ask for a determination on this request within 10 days of your receipt of it, and an even earlier reply if you can make that determination without having to review the record(s) in question.

 

If you determine that any or all or the information is exempt from disclosure, I ask that you reconsider that determination in view of Prop 59, which has amended the state Constitution to require that all exemptions be "narrowly construed." Prop 59 may modify or overturn authorities on which you have relied in the past.

 

If you nonetheless determine that the requested records are subject to a still-valid exemption, I would further request that: (1) you exercise your discretion to disclose some or all of the records notwithstanding the exemption; and (2) that, with respect to records containing both exempt and non-exempt content, you redact the exempt content and disclose the rest.

 

You must provide assistance by helping to identify records and information relevant to the request and suggesting ways to overcome any practical basis for denying access.

 

Finally, should you deny part or this entire request, you are required to provide a written response describing the legal authority or authorities on which you rely. Please also address the question whether Prop 59 requires disclosure even though authorities predating Prop 59 may appear to support your exemption claim.

 

Records concerning litigation are exempt only until the claim is resolved or settled. Upon disposition all records including court records and those pre-dating the suit are public.

 

If I can provide any clarification that will help expedite your attention to this request, please contact me at the number above.  I ask that you notify me of any duplication costs so that I may decide which records I want copied.

 

I am sending a copy of this letter to your legal advisor to help encourage a speedy determination, and I would likewise be happy to discuss my request with him or his designee at any time.

 

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

 

Sincerely,

Barry Allen