New Fire Models, Week # 1, Introduction

 

For years, I have researched and collected data on Fire Departments, particularly in the City of Glendale, my purpose being to offer some general understanding about fire operations. My hope is that this information will stimulate public discussion and debate on ways to improve overall performance and to control costs. There is an opportunity to save up to $15 million per year and increase the overall value and services rendered by the fire department. First, we all agree that we have an outstanding fire department that wants to provide the best and finest service. The Glendale Fire Department, and specifically Chief Gray, provided important leadership in the development of Fire District Area C, comprising 40 fire stations in eleven cities. By eliminating jurisdictional boundaries, they have been able to reduced response times on emergency calls. We also agree that the public has a stake in the delivery of those services because, ultimately, they are the recipients of those, often times, life-threatening emergencies. They are also the consumers who pay for them.

 

My career in public safety covered three decades and I served my last two years as police chief for the City of Pasadena. In the early 80’s, I commanded the Support Services Division of the Pasadena Fire Department under the newly formed Public Safety Agency. The fire chief occupied an office next to mine for several years and that experience stimulated my interest in the fire service.

 

After I retired, I began to meet with working and retired fire chiefs and rank-and-file firefighters over a five-year period. I will refer to them as the career firefighter study group. After reviewing the actual data on firefighter’s activity, they began to come up with several new methods or models of delivering fire services to the public that would be more efficient and save lives and control costs. These models are fairly simple and easy to understand and were developed from actual data supplied by fire departments under the public records act.

 

Fire Departments, and their culture of family, began to form in the nineteenth century and the vast majority of its benefactors, from the newest recruit to the chief, work consciously and unconsciously to protect the status quo. Real analysis of data leading to change coming from inside the organization is almost impossible. David Fleming, former president of the Los Angeles City Fire Commission, in addressing problems in the Los Angeles Fire Department, said recently, “The public doesn’t understand what goes on in that department.”  Having spoken with Mr. Fleming personally, his statement, in part, means that there is little, if any, transparency in fire departments. The public has a certain perception based upon positive community contacts at festivals, parades, ceremonies, and elementary school visits where the children climb on the fire engine wearing their red fire hats and junior fire badges. Fleming is as frustrated as most and would like for the public to have real knowledge of fire departments because that is the only way any positive change can be made.

 

With entry-level Glendale firefighters earning $90,000, engineers at $101,000 and captains at $120,000, all receiving, on average, $30,000 per year in overtime, and with a 60% added benefit package, the public has a right and duty to look inside their fire departments and determine if they are providing the kind of cost-effective services they want. The career firefighter study group was able to break free from the traditions and culture and began to formulate new ways to deliver fire services.

 

It is understandable that many firefighters resist change. However, some of the best practices in the fire service are being compromised under the banner of tradition and culture. If it were not at the expense of public safety, it probably could be tolerated. My motivation is to find ways to improve the services firefighters provide that will benefit the public. Glendale firefighters are a dedicated group who perform their responsibilities professionally; but as you will learn, modifying some policies would benefit the public both in emergency services and costs.  

 

With the authority of the Public Records Act, fire department operational data has been collected over the course of many years. This information is not readily offered to the public or city council because it may alter their perceptions of the fire department. As a former police chief and special assistant to the city manager in Pasadena, I believe more information makes for better decisions by decision makers. I will present some of this data over the course of the next few months in five-minute segments.

 

It will be presented in the perspective of sound management principles, void of the myths and traditions that are ingrained in the fire service today. It will open up valuable opportunities. The annual potential savings to Glendale is in the vicinity of $11 to $15 million. These innovative ideas were developed in collaboration with the career firefighters study group. With over 300 years of collective experience in the fire service, their analysis of present operations lead to several new models they know would provide better and more cost-effective services to the public.

 

The engine companies, usually staffed with four firefighters, are the first responders on all medical, fire and rescue calls. Nearly 90% of their emergency calls provide backup to the paramedic ambulances. The engine arrives, on average, 57 seconds before the ambulance.   

 

The nine engine companies, on average, respond to 4.4 calls per 24-hour shift. The four calls are for medical backup and the 0.4-call is typically a fire call -- not a fire incident as the fire department claims. Almost all fire calls are of a minor nature and easily handled by the single engine company. The International Association of Firefighters, which is the international firefighters union, states that 90% of all fires can be extinguished with the 500 gallons of water on board the engine and that 93% of all fire alarm calls are false. That leaves very few of the 1700 annual fire calls resulting in significant events. In fact, last year, only five of the 1700 fire calls were considered major events. Fire calls have been going down drastically over the past three-decades as new building materials, building codes, early detection systems and automatic sprinkler systems have become the norm. That’s the good news, but medical emergency calls are rising faster than fire calls are declining. Medical calls have doubled over the past twenty years and will continue to climb in the foreseeable future while fire calls have declined by about one thousand in that same time period.

 

The average time an engine spends on a call is fifteen minutes regardless if it is a fire or medical call. That is down from eighteen and a half minutes ten years ago. That means that an engine company averaging 4.4 calls per shift spends less than one hour and fifteen minutes, or about 4% of their on-duty time responding to and completing those calls. In 1998, Emergency Consulting & Research Center, a private consulting firm, examined some of this data and stated in its report to the Glendale Fire Department, “The great majority of fires are single-alarm incidents handled by the first-due (engine) company. These incidents are resolved quickly and do not impact the overall emergency response capability of the fire department”. The report goes on to say, “Using the average time on-task interval for medical responses, the GFD spends 2.8% of the available on-duty engine company time per shift and 0.7 % on fire calls”. This is a total of 3.6% of a shift. In addition, firefighters average less than one hour per shift training and about one hour doing maintenance around the station. The productive time on an average 24-hour shift, including training, maintenance and responding on emergency calls is about 3 hours.

 

A truck company averages less than 2 calls per 24-hour shift. Some fire stations are busier than others, but it is not uncommon for a truck company and some engine companies to have no calls at all during a 24-hour shift. Other times, although rare, engine companies can log up to ten or more calls per shift. But even with that volume, at fifteen minutes per run, they are handling calls for no more than three hours or about 12% of their shift. Most calls occur during normal waking hours, with increased demand reflecting the burgeoning daytime population. We don’t pay firefighters to be productive during their entire 24-hour shift, we pay them well to respond to emergency calls as fast as is humanly possible and to handle the incidents professionally, following established training and protocols. They are the highest paid workforce in all of government and we should expect that they adopt the best practices to deliver the services they provide the public.

 

No informed citizen or fire official will disagree with the following premise: that the Best Practice for emergency response occurs when the engine and truck companies and firefighters and rescue ambulances and paramedics are in their neighborhood fire stations, ready to respond to emergency calls. Fire stations are generally located near the geographic center of their districts so that they have the ability to respond in any direction with similar response times. Anything less than that has the potential of impacting performance by adding seconds or minutes on emergency calls. Engine and truck companies know this as “geographic integrity”. This means that the firefighters are committed to being in their fire districts, allowing the best possible response times to the neighborhoods they serve. They are dedicated to doing everything reasonably possible to remain at maximum readiness, all personnel and apparatus in district and preferably in station. All fire personnel consider rapid response to be first and foremost in their mission of providing the finest emergency services to the public. We will return next week and address the first of several subjects that pertain to policies that effect response time, efficiencies, best practices and cost savings.

 

Copywrite 2007

 

Contact information for questions and copies of the document:

 

Bruce Philpott

Phone: (818) 240-8949

Email: logicpoint@aol.com/