In a message dated 4/8/2008 11:03:40 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, Brcphilpott1@aol.com  writes:

 

Ms. Varpetian, the Glendale Fire Department, as a public agency whose primary mission is to provide emergency care for trauma and other medical patients in crises (88% of their emergency responses are medical in nature) with an annual budget of $60 million, I am not just surprised it hasn't been keeping any records of its multiple victim incidents filed by that category, but I wonder what other key data they do not compile that could provide records of trends or patterns that will go undetected. Last night Deputy Fire Chief Howard, in response to questions at the Neighborhood Coordinating Council Meeting, said the fire department missed the data that presented irrefutable evidence of excessive response delays when firefighters were jogging in remote parts or at other locations that were out of their fire districts. It was only after I had presented the data to the public and city council did they acknowledge the need to cancel the off-site jogging policy. With twice the average response times, this policy has been adversely affecting emergency responses since 1995. This has amounted to thousands of emergency calls  where medical victims experienced long, and in some cases, delays that may have had adverse outcomes. It is interesting to note that the fire department began to experience these excessive delays when it first put the off-site jogging policy into effect (1995), but, due to their interest to allow firefighters to jog in lush park surroundings in deference to the need to get to time-sensitive emergencies quicker, this flawed policy continued for over a decade. Last night Chief Howard said they were unaware of this problem before I presented the data. That is absolutely incorrect and flies in the face of common sense and reason. In 2004, their own consultant told them of these excessive delays. He labeled them "failed incidents". I then tried to inform the fire department of this problem and presented them with my preliminary data three years ago in a formal meeting with chief officers. I guess the dislike of the messenger trumped the value of the message because they chose to ignore the data at that time. It was only until I made the data public by sharing it with the city council did the fire department acknowledge and correct the problem. 

 

What other policies or practices are contributing to excessive and preventable emergency response delays? I have discovered many more and will be presenting them to the city council in the months ahead. The fire department chose to ignore them when they made their power point presentations to the city council on 4-7-08, even though I had identified and reported them in my earlier presentations. The hundreds of annual calls that will now have their response times cut in half with the rescinding of the off-site jogging policy is only the tip of the ice berg when compared to the many other preventable practices the fire department continues to ignore. But with the data that I have acquired through the Public Records Act, the public and city council will learn of the many other opportunities to cut critical response times to medical and fire emergencies by simply changing some additional policies and practices.

 

None of these policy changes could have come about without the benefit of the Public Record Act. While the City of Glendale, in my experience, has a very poor performance record of providing public records, persistence will prevail and better public policy will eventually evolve.

 

Sincerely,

 

Bruce Philpott

 

 

In a message dated 4/8/2008 9:02:46 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, LVarpetian@ci.glendale.ca.us writes:

Mr. Phipott:

 

I now understand the confusion.  The GFD does not keep record of MVI.  The information from the worksheet transfers to individual EMS forms.  Each victim’s information is captured in a separate report.  It is a rare instance if multiple victims are mentioned in the same report.  In those instances, the City has no way of searching for that information, without reviewing each report.

 

Lucy Varpetian

Senior Assistant City Attorney

Office of the Glendale City Attorney

613 East Broadway, Suite 220

Glendale, CA  91206

Tel: 818-548-2080

Fax: 818-547-3402

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brcphilpott1@aol.com [mailto:Brcphilpott1@aol.com]
Sent:
Monday, April 07, 2008 3:17 PM
To: Varpetian, Lucy
Subject: Re: Request Response to my letters

 

Ms. Varpetian, without any record of past Multi Victim Incidents, how can the GFD plan and prepare for future events of this nature? Please inform me what happens to the EMS forms? Are they destroyed after they have had the MVI Casualty Report data transferred onto them? Why would the GFD transfer data from one form -- the MVI -- onto another form -- the EMS -- and then destroy both documents? Or are they sent some place where they are no longer made available under the PRA? Please note number one (1) of my PRAR. It specifically asked for the EMS form that contains the MVI data. It would have made more sense to me if you had told me that the GFD does not keep any records regarding MVI's. But when you tell me that the MVI data has been transferred onto another form (EMS), and I request a copy of that form, you tell me it doesn't exist. I am confused and vexed. Please explain. Sincerely, Bruce Philpott.

 

In a message dated 4/7/2008 2:17:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, LVarpetian@ci.glendale.ca.us writes:

Mr. Philpott:

 

It was implicit in my earlier email, that the City had received your request for records outlining 10 different categories of documents.  Our response to your request remains that the City has no responsive documents.  The Fire Department does not keep record for incidents where there are multiple victims and/or casualties. 

 

Lucy Varpetian

Senior Assistant City Attorney

Office of the Glendale City Attorney

613 East Broadway, Suite 220

Glendale, CA  91206

Tel: 818-548-2080

Fax: 818-547-3402

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brcphilpott1@aol.com [mailto:Brcphilpott1@aol.com]
Sent:
Monday, April 07, 2008 1:53 PM
To: Varpetian, Lucy
Cc: Howard, Scott
Subject: Re: Request Response to my letters

 

Ms. Varpetian, you did not respond to the portion of my email that requested up to ten (10) different documents that the MVI records may have morphed into. You did not acknowledge the formal Public Records Act Request that was contained in the email. Question: when I send you (City Attorney's Office) an email with a formal request for records by citing the Public Records Act, are you allowed to ignore it? If the answer is no, then why did you not acknowledge the request and tell me that it was received on the date that the email was sent to you. If the answer is yes, then please state the authority under the law that permits you to deny my the request by submitting it to your office, and tell me what I have to do to make the formal request for the records I am asking for.  

 

Sincerely,

 

Bruce Philpott

 

In a message dated 4/7/2008 11:00:04 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, LVarpetian@ci.glendale.ca.us writes:

Mr. Philpott:

 

It is not my intent to vex you.  I am simply stating that the City does not retain records of multi-victim incidents.  We cannot produce records we do not have.

 

Lucy Varpetian

Senior Assistant City Attorney

Office of the Glendale City Attorney

613 East Broadway, Suite 220

Glendale, CA  91206

Tel: 818-548-2080

Fax: 818-547-3402

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brcphilpott1@aol.com [mailto:Brcphilpott1@aol.com]
Sent:
Friday, March 28, 2008 6:39 PM
To: Varpetian, Lucy
Subject: Re: Request Response to my letters

 

Ms. Varpetian,

 

Please note that this response to your latest email contains a public records act request.

 

Thank you for a quick response, however, you only informed me that the forms were destroyed after the data was transferred onto an EMS form. It is obvious to all of us what information I am seeking, however, it seems that I will have to continue searching in hopes to find the data that is there somewhere. It would save us all a lot of time if you would just tell me which document to request.

 

Without any further information, I have no other choice but to request (PLEASE CONSIDER THIS A PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQEUST) (1) EMS forms that contain a category of Multi Victim Incidents or (2) maybe Multi Casualty Incidents, or (3) maybe Multi Casualty Reports, or (3-A) Multi Victim Incidents Reports, or (4) any and/or all such reports, or documents, during the last twelve months, or (5) a statistical entry that shows the total number of incidents during the same time period or (6) during a recent twelve month period that contained such data such as might be contained in annual reporting forms to OSHA, or (7) CAL OSHA, or maybe (8) OES, or (9) NFPA, (10) any other annual, semi annual, quarterly reporting requirements that contain the above specified documents, to any other agency or organization that such documents are sent, either required or requested by statutes or established practice. 

 

This could be a lot easier, cost-effective process by just cooperating a little. It seems like you are making an intentional effort to vex me.

 

Sincerely,

 

Bruce Philpott

1418 Western Ave

Glendale, CA 91201

240-8949

 

In a message dated 3/28/2008 5:35:19 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, LVarpetian@ci.glendale.ca.us writes:

Mr. Philpott:

 

Consistent with my letter of February 29, 2008, the Fire Department does not retain in its ordinary course of business the Multi-Casualty Recorder Worksheet.  After the information in the worksheet is transcribed onto the EMS form, the worksheet is then destroyed.  Accordingly, there are no records responsive to your request.

 

Lucy Varpetian

Senior Assistant City Attorney

Office of the Glendale City Attorney

613 East Broadway, Suite 220

Glendale, CA  91206

Tel: 818-548-2080

Fax: 818-547-3402

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brcphilpott1@aol.com [mailto:Brcphilpott1@aol.com]
Sent:
Friday, March 28, 2008 5:29 PM
To: Varpetian, Lucy
Cc: Howard, Scott
Subject: Request Response to my letters

 

Dear Ms Varpetian,

 

I am, once again, trying to get an accurate and proper response from the City of Glendale (City Attorneys Office and the Fire Department) regarding access to public documents. Specifically, it has to do with my PRAR of February 15, 2008, wherein I requested copies of the Glendale Fire Department's MVI (Multiple Victim Incidents) reports. In a letter from you dated February 29, 2008, you advised me that "the Fire Department does not maintain a separate report that identifies the information requested in item # 3", which is the item requesting MVI reports.

 

In a response letter to you dated March 5, 2008, I stated the following:

 

Dear Ms. Varpetian,

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated February 29, 2008, wherein you state that records responsive to item # 3 (Multiple Victim Incident Reports) do not exist and therefore are not maintained by the Glendale Fire Department.

 

I would like to refer you to the Fire Department Policy and Procedure Manual, Chapter 7, page 7 of 7, which address the procedural issues of MVI events. Please note under the last subheading "Transport", last entry, it states, "Use Multi Casualty Recorder Worksheet". I can only assume that fire personnel are directed by this policy to complete these forms that are then made a matter of historic record and are on file. Either this policy has been repealed, universally violated or there are, in fact, files that contain these records.

 

Please let me know which is the case as soon as possible.

 

Sincerely,

Bruce Philpott

1418 Western Ave

Glendale, CA 91201

240-8949

 

 Attached to that letter I enclosed a copy of the page of the GFD's policy that states:

 

                                               Fire Department Police and Procedure Manual

 

                                                       Multi Victim Incident (MVI)

 

                                                Use Multi Casualty Recorder Worksheet

 

 If I am not using the exact terminology to get you to extract this data for me, please inform me as to what language would produce better results. Do I have to use in my PRAR the words "Multi Casualty Recorder Worksheet? This information is extremely important to my continuing investigation of policies that have implications of fiscal waste and unnecessarily adding delays to emergency response times.

 

Sincerely,

Bruce Philpott

1418 Western Ave

Glendale, CA 91201

240-8949