09-16-09, Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley Supports Glendale Mayor Frank Quintero’s Suppression of Public Input

In response to a complaint that Glendale Mayor Frank Quintero is denying the public the right to address the Glendale City Council regarding any item on the agenda unless a Speaker Card is submitted BEFORE said item is presented to the council, Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley has gone on record as supporting Mayor Quintero over the interests of the public.

Therefore, any legislative body in the State of California can limit public input regarding the content of agenda items by adopting the “Quintero Anti-Public-Input Doctrine”.  See VIDEO.

The only way government watchdogs can overcome this prohibition is to submit Speaker Cards (or otherwise indicate intent to speak) for every item on the agenda BEFORE hearing any of the presentations!

Hal Weber, ( halweber@earthlink.net )

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject:  Allegation of Brown Act Violation by Mayor Quintero

Dear Mr. Weber,

We received your complaint alleging that Glendale Mayor Frank Quintero is violating the Brown Act by "not allowing members of the public to address the council unless they have submitted a speaker card BEFORE commencement of agenda items". Government Code Section 54954.3(a) provides that "(E)very agenda for regular meeting shall provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the legislative body on any item of interest to the public, before or during the legislative body's consideration of the item, that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body". This section was adopted by in 1993, and continues to be the legal authority that mandates public comment before or during consideration of each agenda item, as well as general public comment. In the ensuing years, the courts have made clear that the right to public comment is not unfettered. Courts have consistently found meetings of legislative bodies are limited public fora, meaning that the public's rights to speak are not absolute. The Brown Act, permits legislative bodies, like a city council, to regulate the time, place and manner of public comments. Government Code Section 54954.3(b) states "(T)he legislative body of a local agency may adopt reasonable regulations to ensure that the intent of subdivision (a) is carried out, including, but not limited to, regulations limiting the total amount of time allocated for public testimony on particular issues and for each individual speaker." This has been upheld by the court repeatedly in the years following the adoption of this statutory language.

In that regard, the use of speaker cards is, in fact, a permissible regulation of public comments. The purpose of speaker cards is to ensure that those who wish to address the council are recognized, and that the agency can determine how much time to allocate to the matters about which the speakers want to address the agency on a particular item. The use of speaker cards permits the agency to allocate the time available in a way that is reasonable, given the issues and interest demonstrated by the speaker cards gathered prior to consideration of agenda items.

Your observation that "members of the public have no way of knowing beforehand everything that is going to come up during an agenda item presentation to which they may take exception and therefore wish to address the council" is valid. However, it is equally important to recall that public comment as set forth in the Brown Act, and as reviewed by the courts, does not create a right to public dialog. In fact, the Brown Act, by its own terms, proscribes such a situation by restricting members of legislative bodies to briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights under Section 54954.3. See, Government Code Section 54954.2(a).

Given the well-established state of the law, we find that the Burbank City Council's use of speaker cards, and the requirement that speaker cards must be submitted before commencement of the agenda or an agenda item is a reasonable regulation that is content-neutral. We conclude therefore, that the use of speaker cards by the
Burbank City Council as described in your complaint complies with the requirements of the Brown Act, and no further action will be taken by this office at this time.

Thank you for your interest and advocacy on behalf of public participation in government. Be assured that we will continue to actively enforce the letter and the spirit of the Brown Act in order to ensure that the public's right to open and transparent decision-making is protected.

Very truly yours,

STEVE COOLEY
District Attorney
By
JENNIFER LENTZ SNYDER
Assistant Head Deputy
Public Integrity Division
(213) 974-6513