From: Bruce Philpott

To: halweber@earthlink.net

Sent: 9/4/2008 1:53:03 PM

Subject: Re: New Content: Embassy Suites Hotel Helicopter Landing Pad

 

Hal, the underlining problem is not with whether the specifications were met by the contractor. The real question is why was the helipad mandated in the first place. The answer is that the fire and police departments somehow convinced city planners that all high rise buildings be constructed with helipads on the roof top. Their reasoning was that it would be good for "public safety".

 

This is an unreasonable expectation and costs developers hundreds of thousands of dollars needlessly. There has never been an incident in this city where a helipad was needed on a high rise builiding, which have been around for many decades. There has not been one structure fire in a high rise building in Glendale in its history.  The only exception for the need for a helipad is a hospital for obvious reasons. The rest does not pass the common sense test. 

 

The best outcome in this case is to remove the helipad requirement and let the contractor dismantle the landing pad.

 

Bruce