06-26-09, Bruce Philpott Responds to Maria Smart’s GNP Letter,Editors wrong to admonish police”

Maria Smart is obviously a keen observer of the local public safety scene as demonstrated in her GNP letter criticizing the GNP Opinion Piece that criticized the police union for not renegotiating its raise.  She is drawn in, like many, to the emotionally charged issue of "laying their lives on the line".  She presented her emotional buildup starting out with a Daily reminder that the cops face danger; then to the Hourly: triage and trouble shoot; followed by Minutes: No two alike; and ending with a Second: could lose their lives.

 

She must have forgotten that those are the same kind of emotionally charged phrases that firefighters use to draw sympathy from the public and to justify their compensation level.  But if she were able to set aside emotions and check the occupational fatalities contained in the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, she would have discerned that both police officers and firefighters are substantially below many occupations commonly thought to be less risky.  While police remain a few percentage points above firefighters in annual deaths, neither one is substantially above the average in occupations across the country.

 

When she states that firefighters know about as much about guns as cops know about fire hoses, she must not have read the present union contract that obligates the city to pay firefighters assigned to arson investigation monthly bonuses for scoring high marks on the shooting range.

 

She is also a few million off on how much overtime was distributed amongst the firefighters last year.  While she cites $5 million, the real number is between $7 & 8 million.  It is very hard to pin down because the city refuses to put the exact number in a form that the public can understand.  Each firefighter last year, on average, made an extra $40,000 in overtime, while the cops averaged about $8,000.  

 

It was this $32,000 disparity in overtime that caused the police union members to vote to reject opening the contract.  They figure the extra 6% that will come to them beginning July 1 and the 5% more on July 1 next year will help close the gap.

 

The cops have been looking at the $100,000 club and they clearly see that firefighters are all making much more than they are in total compensation.  Why would they waive a raise in an existing contract that would put them further behind the firefighters?  This is not rocket science; it is predictable human nature 101.

 

Bruce Philpott