04-25-10, Response by Bruce Philpott to GNP Article and Molano's
Commentary Regarding
The predictions
of those concerned citizens who valiantly tried to warn the city years ago of
the impending fiscal crisis and were vilified for their efforts by Jim Starbird, the city council, top managers and union bosses,
may be vindicated sooner than later.
There are a
few more “Big Lies” than Jim Starbird’s quote in the GNP
article.
Here are a
few more Big Lies coming out of the article:
1.
Huge
benefits were given to city employees many years ago by former city councils
and as a result of the great recession this
city council will have to make the drastic corrections.
Truth: The current city council – Friedman
excepted – approved a 16 ½% pay raise for firemen over a recent four year
period while giving the police an 11% raise, 6% this year with another 5% in
July 1, 2010.
Truth: The glaring budget deficits started
to appear in fiscal year 2002, not in 2008 as the article implies. The largesse
didn’t stop with previous councils and the deficit spending wasn’t triggered by
the recession.
2.
Starbird has been victimized by the lies coming from the state and CalPERS.
Truth: Starbird
has been on record for years justifying the huge pay and benefits packages
given the unions, arguing as did the fire union president in the article, that the city has to pay employees enough to retain
them. This position flies in the face of most studies that refute the claim.
Truth:
Truth: contrary to fire union president Stavros’s
claim that the city lost fire employees to other departments who offered better
pay and benefits,
Truth: Starbird
has always approved of the city taking out long term bond debt. He went on
record last year at a HOACC meeting that the city pension funds were sound (in
spite of city and CalPERS financial data that showed
otherwise) and he thought long-term borrowing by the city’s Redevelopment
Agency was a good idea and should continue.
3.
Starbird quote, “My view is we should have stayed where we were”.
Truth: A hypocritical statement if I ever
heard one. It might be fun to go back
into the video archives of council meetings where Starbird
argued how important it was to approve large pay and benefit packages to
recruit and retain top people, and, of course, followed by a 5-0 vote by a
willing council, each a benefactor of the unions’ largesse during the last
election.
The naïve
reporter wrote: “Under the proposed plan, a 55 year old police officer retiring
at a salary of $90,000 after 30 years of service would receive a retirement of
about $54,000 per year. Under the current plan, the same officer could retire
at 50, after 25 years of service, and receive a $67,000 annual check.
The paragraph
should have read: All current firemen and police officers, totaling more than
500, and including many retirees already, will retire at 90% of their highest
annual pay if they work for 30 years. Half of them will retire before 30 years
by claiming a disability and will receive a large cash payout and a portion of
their retirement will be tax free. Very few public safety employees retire at
the entry level rank. Most full service public safety employees retire at a
higher rank and average well in excess of $100,000 per year. As of July 1,
2010, entry level police officers will receive over $100,000 in annual
pay. Firefighters who have paramedic
certificates receive $107,000 entry level top step pay.
The Glendale
News Press has once again failed to provide a balanced article on a very
important local issue which is replete with false data and Big Lies.