I was mistaken to have characterized
Bruce Philpott’s Fire Department plan as replacing
firemen with Boy Scouts.
It might be unusual for a candidate to
admit an error of interpretation in the last two weeks of a campaign—but
character isn’t worth a damn if timing is an issue. Reducing fire crews
to stem the tide of overtime without laying off
personnel may yield a fiscal benefit, though I am not convinced that his approach
is appropriate for
I have expressed concerns to Bruce
directly that finding solutions by carrying a baseball bat to the bargaining
table or vilifying the firemens’ association was not likely
to succeed. There are a variety of public safety models that could better
serve Glendale and address the excessive overtime issues—Bruce’s plan might be
one of them—but none of them will happen without buy in from everyone. Including the fire association. Hugo Chavez can make
unilateral changes, but our government (perhaps unfortunately) doesn’t work
that way.
I have suggested that we can address the
overtime issue and maintain 4 person crews while we evaluate models that push
an
It is probably political suicide to say
that solutions aren’t simple, that they will take time and that building
consensus might actually be necessary. It looks like I don’t think it’s
important or am willing to put it on the back
burner. I could care less, though, because it’s the truth.
As though the truth matters in
campaigns.
I will still, however, take him to task
over his characterization of the city’s use of bond debt to balance the budget.
Politics isn’t any fun without a fight.
So, for jumping the gun, Bruce, I
apologize.
Michael Teahan